Gannets

Gannets

Thursday 14 July 2016

Report on nest box monitoring on Landsort - spring/summer of 2016


Below is a short report on how things went with monitoring nest boxes on Landsort this year. Apologies for it not being in Swedish!!!!
Hope you enjoy!!
Report to Landsort Bird Observatory Board on the monitoring of nest boxes in the spring of 2016

Prepared by Chris Sharpe – June 2016

Background

By 2008 a significant number of next boxes had been placed in the woods on Landsort. Although some ringing of young in boxes has taken place in the years since, there is no recent record on file of a systematic programme of monitoring.
Within the overall workload to be undertaken by Kay and me during 2016 it was agreed that a review of occupancy should take place with young ringed at the nest wherever possible.
 In preparation for this a couple of Observatory Members removed old nest material from 98 boxes over the winter of 2015/16. This work supported work done by Kay & me in the autumn of 2014 to empty and repair c150 boxes.
As part of the preparatory work a schedule of known nest boxes, their identification number and approximate location was stored on file and made available to us when we commenced our work for the season.
Methods

In late April, a review of the computer file revealed that 261 boxes had been recorded on the protocol. The location of each of these boxes was indicated on maps held on the office computer, numbered 0 to 260 consecutively. Printed copies of these maps were used to locate the boxes during field visits with notes taken in a pocket book which were transferred to the computer protocol at the end of each day. 

All nest box work was undertaken in the afternoon/early evenings after the eight hour morning mist-netting sessions were completed.

Twenty-eight boxes were examined on the 27th and 30th April, as a sample, in order to determine how the breeding season was progressing. These visits revealed partly built nests in some, probably Great Tit, with some Starling already incubating eggs.

On 2nd May those boxes marked on the protocol as being designed for Wryneck were visited and dry wood chippings placed in the bottom, this being recommended as a means of helping attract the species to build. A small number of other boxes were examined on the same day.

Thereafter, visits on six further afternoons: 25th and 31st May and 2nd, 3rd, 5th and 6th June were undertaken to look for and examine all nest boxes and ring any young that were large enough.

Additional visits were undertaken on: 4th, 10th, 12th, 14th, 17th, 21st, 24th & 30th June to check progress on late nests.

Results

Of the 261 boxes marked on the protocol, the locations for only 259 were marked on the maps stored on computer: boxes ‘0’ and ‘42’ having no record shown.

Of the 259 boxes marked on the map, 11 were not looked for, simply due to a combination of time restrictions and tiredness!! In total 248 boxes were searched for (96% coverage). Of these, 20 nest boxes were looked for but could not be found. Eleven boxes were located but were discovered on the ground, either having fallen off the tree or the tree itself had fallen over.

Therefore, a total of 217 boxes were located and in a good enough condition to be used for breeding. This represents 86% of the boxes marked on the map. Of these 71 (32.7%) were occupied this year.

A summary of occupied boxes where chicks were ringed is shown below:

Species                           
No. Occupied boxes
Total young ringed

Great Tit 
29156

Blue Tit 
217

Marsh Tit 
14

Starling 
1348

Pied Flycatcher 
17

Robin 
14

Tree Sparrow
12
     
Discussion

A total of 238 young of 7 species were ringed from 48 nests. Data gathered from ringing young in the nest is of high conservation value. Much information is gathered in this way that it is not possible to gather from routine mist-netting. Exact location of breeding, clutch size and sibling relationships are all known from nest box studies. In more detailed studies, with marking of adults, the relationship between pairs can also be determined, as can site fidelity and longevity, laying dates and fledging dates etc.

As at the time of writing this report, 20 individuals ringed in the nest had been re-caught during routine mist-netting, giving some indication of fledging success, though more detailed study would be needed to draw any firm conclusions from the work of just one year. The 20 young (4 Starling, 14 Great Tit & 2 Marsh Tit) come from just 8 nests. The four Starling came from three different sites, while the 14 Great Tit came from four broods: six of the seven ringed at Box 101 have been re-caught, four of the six at Box 4, three out of four from Box 60 and just one from the brood of seven in Box 18 has been re-caught.  

Nest box work can be challenging; mosquitos, thorns, bogs, tangled under-growth and elusive nest boxes, all add to a sense of frustration especially after early morning starts. There is no doubt however that it brings many rewards. It provides a great opportunity to wander through a beautiful island and there is a great sense of achievement in finding the boxes. Where else can you open a nest box and come face to face with a Viper!! The main benefit though is the conservation value of the work.

Although some of the nestlings have already been re-caught it is anticipated that there will be more caught as the autumn progresses, adding to the already considerable value of the work undertaken.

Working on nest box studies is a valuable means by which someone with an interest in bird research and ringing can gain experience. The work done in 2016, although comprehensive in terms of coverage and birds ringed, was not the most detailed of studies that could be undertaken. Most boxes were visited on only one or two occasions. More intensive research could add to the value by studying such things as foraging rates and productivity (ratio of eggs laid to young hatched and young fledged). Long-term studies add to our understanding of laying dates and site fidelity (do adults use the same boxes year after year). The work of 2016 represents a welcome return to monitoring nest boxes on Landsort. It was not the most detailed study that could have been done but it does demonstrate what can be achieved.

Approximately 50 hours work over a six week period (mainly during 2 weeks) has produced good research information.

At the end of the breeding season – probably as late as early November when general ringing has become less busy it is intended that the boxes will be revisited to empty them of old nest material and put back on the trees those that have fallen off.

Note, that as not all boxes were emptied of old nest material in either 2014 or 2015 it was not possible to say with certainty whether a nest was from 2016 but failed, or was from an earlier year with no nesting attempt in the current year. Emptying all boxes at the end of each breeding season (with the exception of Wryneck & Nuthatch nests) will allow for an evaluation of nesting attempt versus nesting success.

No comments:

Post a Comment